A filibuster is a legislative tactic used to delay or prevent a vote on a bill or other motion in a legislative body, typically through extended debate or other dilatory tactics. Filibusters can occur in both the United States Senate and the House of Representatives, though they are more common in the Senate. The word "filibuster" comes from the Dutch term "vrijbuiter," which means "pirate" or "freebooter." In politics, it refers to an individual or group using delaying tactics to achieve their goals.
Filibusters have been used in the United States since the early 19th century. The first filibuster recorded in the Senate occurred in 1806, while the first filibuster in the House of Representatives occurred in 1841. In recent years, filibusters have become more common, particularly in the Senate. In the 116th Congress (2019-2020), there were 33 cloture votes taken in the Senate, which is the highest number of cloture votes in any Congress since 1917.
While filibusters can be an effective way to delay or prevent legislation, they can also be seen as a form of obstructionism that prevents the legislative process from working as it should. As a result, there have been several attempts to reform or eliminate the filibuster, but these efforts have been unsuccessful thus far.
what is a filibuster
A filibuster is a tactic used to delay or prevent a vote on a bill or other motion in a legislative body.
- Delaying tactic
- Prevent a vote
- Used in US Senate and House
- Common in Senate
- Dutch term "vrijbuiter"
- Means "pirate" or "freebooter"
- First Senate filibuster in 1806
- First House filibuster in 1841
Filibusters can be effective, but also seen as obstructionism.
Delaying tactic
A filibuster is a delaying tactic used to prevent or delay a vote on a bill or other motion in a legislative body. Filibusters can be used by a minority of members to block legislation that they oppose. They can also be used to force the majority to compromise on a bill.
Filibusters are typically conducted by one or more members of the legislative body speaking for hours or even days on end. This prevents the legislative body from moving on to other business, such as voting on the bill or motion. Filibusters can also be conducted by submitting numerous amendments to the bill or motion, which can also delay the vote.
Filibusters can be effective in delaying or even preventing legislation from being passed. However, they can also be seen as a form of obstructionism that prevents the legislative process from working as it should. As a result, there have been several attempts to reform or eliminate the filibuster, but these efforts have been unsuccessful thus far.
In the United States Senate, filibusters are particularly common. The Senate has a tradition of unlimited debate, which means that any senator can speak for as long as they want on any bill or motion. This makes it very difficult for the majority party to pass legislation without the support of the minority party.
Filibusters have been used on a number of high-profile bills in recent years, including the Affordable Care Act and the DREAM Act. They have also been used to block judicial nominations and other presidential appointments.
Prevent a vote
One of the main purposes of a filibuster is to prevent a vote on a bill or other motion. This can be done in a number of ways.
- Talking until the time limit expires: In some legislative bodies, there is a time limit for debate on a bill or motion. If a filibusterer can talk for long enough, they can prevent the vote from taking place before the time limit expires.
- Submitting numerous amendments: Filibusterers can also submit numerous amendments to the bill or motion. This can delay the vote, as each amendment must be debated and voted on separately.
- Raising points of order: Filibusterers can also raise points of order, which are objections to the way that the legislative body is conducting its business. This can also delay the vote, as the presiding officer must rule on the point of order before the debate can continue.
- Using procedural maneuvers: Filibusterers can also use procedural maneuvers to delay or prevent a vote. For example, they can object to the unanimous consent request, which is a request to pass a bill or motion without a vote. They can also move to adjourn the legislative body, which would end the debate and prevent the vote from taking place.
Filibusters can be very effective in preventing a vote on a bill or motion. In some cases, they can even prevent the bill or motion from being passed altogether.
Used in US Senate and House
Filibusters can be used in both the United States Senate and the House of Representatives. However, they are more common in the Senate.
- Unlimited debate in the Senate: The Senate has a tradition of unlimited debate, which means that any senator can speak for as long as they want on any bill or motion. This makes it very difficult for the majority party to pass legislation without the support of the minority party.
- Cloture in the Senate: In order to end a filibuster in the Senate, 60 senators must vote to invoke cloture. This is a very high threshold, and it is often difficult to reach. As a result, filibusters are more common in the Senate than in the House of Representatives.
- Previous question in the House: The House of Representatives has a rule called the previous question, which can be used to end debate on a bill or motion. However, the previous question can only be invoked by a majority vote. This means that the majority party can usually prevent the minority party from using filibusters to delay or prevent legislation from being passed.
- Rarely used in the House: Because of the previous question rule, filibusters are rarely used in the House of Representatives. In recent years, there have been only a handful of filibusters in the House.
Filibusters are a controversial tactic, but they are a part of the legislative process in the United States. They can be used to delay or prevent legislation from being passed, but they can also be used to force the majority party to compromise on a bill.
Common in Senate
Filibusters are more common in the United States Senate than in the House of Representatives. There are a number of reasons for this.
First, the Senate has a tradition of unlimited debate. This means that any senator can speak for as long as they want on any bill or motion. This makes it very difficult for the majority party to pass legislation without the support of the minority party.
Second, the Senate has a high threshold for cloture. Cloture is a vote to end debate on a bill or motion. In order to invoke cloture, 60 senators must vote in favor of it. This is a very high threshold, and it is often difficult to reach. As a result, filibusters are more common in the Senate than in the House of Representatives.
Third, the Senate is a smaller body than the House of Representatives. This means that it is easier for a small group of senators to block legislation than it is for a small group of representatives to do so.
Finally, the Senate is often more partisan than the House of Representatives. This means that senators are more likely to use filibusters to block legislation that they oppose.
As a result of these factors, filibusters are more common in the Senate than in the House of Representatives. In recent years, there have been dozens of filibusters in the Senate, while there have been only a handful of filibusters in the House.
Filibusters can be a controversial tactic, but they are a part of the legislative process in the United States. They can be used to delay or prevent legislation from being passed, but they can also be used to force the majority party to compromise on a bill.
Dutch term "vrijbuiter"
The word "filibuster" comes from the Dutch term "vrijbuiter," which means "pirate" or "freebooter." This term was originally used to describe a type of privateer, which was a ship that was armed and equipped by private individuals to attack enemy ships during wartime.
Filibusters were often seen as heroes in the Netherlands, as they were seen as fighting for the country's independence against Spain. However, they were also seen as a threat to international trade, as they often attacked and plundered merchant ships.
The term "filibuster" was first used in a political context in the United States in the early 19th century. It was used to describe a group of senators who were opposed to the annexation of Texas. These senators used a variety of tactics to delay or prevent the vote on annexation, including speaking for hours on end and submitting numerous amendments to the bill.
The term "filibuster" has since been used to describe any politician who uses delaying tactics to prevent a vote on a bill or motion. Filibusters can be used for a variety of reasons, including to block legislation that the filibusterer opposes, to force the majority party to compromise on a bill, or to simply delay the legislative process.
Filibusters can be a controversial tactic, but they are a part of the legislative process in the United States. They can be used to delay or prevent legislation from being passed, but they can also be used to force the majority party to compromise on a bill.
Means "pirate" or "freebooter"
The Dutch term "vrijbuiter" means "pirate" or "freebooter." This term was originally used to describe a type of privateer, which was a ship that was armed and equipped by private individuals to attack enemy ships during wartime.
Privateers were often seen as heroes in the Netherlands, as they were seen as fighting for the country's independence against Spain. However, they were also seen as a threat to international trade, as they often attacked and plundered merchant ships.
The term "filibuster" was first used in a political context in the United States in the early 19th century. It was used to describe a group of senators who were opposed to the annexation of Texas. These senators used a variety of tactics to delay or prevent the vote on annexation, including speaking for hours on end and submitting numerous amendments to the bill.
The term "filibuster" has since been used to describe any politician who uses delaying tactics to prevent a vote on a bill or motion. Filibusters can be used for a variety of reasons, including to block legislation that the filibusterer opposes, to force the majority party to compromise on a bill, or to simply delay the legislative process.
The term "filibuster" is often used in a negative sense, as it can be seen as a way to obstruct the legislative process. However, filibusters can also be used for legitimate purposes, such as to force the majority party to compromise on a bill or to give the minority party a chance to express their views on a bill.
First Senate filibuster in 1806
The first recorded filibuster in the United States Senate occurred in 1806. The issue was a bill to fund the construction of a road from Cumberland, Maryland, to the Ohio River. The bill was supported by President Thomas Jefferson and the Republican Party, but it was opposed by the Federalist Party.
The Federalists used a variety of tactics to delay or prevent the vote on the bill. They spoke for hours on end, submitted numerous amendments to the bill, and raised points of order. They also used procedural maneuvers to try to prevent the bill from coming to a vote.
The filibuster lasted for several weeks, but the Republicans were eventually able to pass the bill. However, the filibuster showed that the Senate was vulnerable to obstructionism, and it set a precedent for future filibusters.
In the years that followed, filibusters became more common in the Senate. They were used by both the Federalists and the Republicans to block legislation that they opposed. Filibusters were also used to force the majority party to compromise on bills.
The use of filibusters has continued to be controversial in the Senate. Some argue that filibusters are a legitimate way for the minority party to express their views and to force the majority party to compromise. Others argue that filibusters are a form of obstructionism that prevents the Senate from functioning properly.
First House filibuster in 1841
The first recorded filibuster in the United States House of Representatives occurred in 1841. The issue was a bill to recharter the Second Bank of the United States. The bill was supported by President John Tyler and the Whig Party, but it was opposed by the Democratic Party.
- Speaking for hours on end: Democratic representatives spoke for hours on end, reading from books and newspapers, and even singing songs. They also submitted numerous amendments to the bill, which further delayed the vote.
- Raising points of order: Democratic representatives also raised numerous points of order, which are objections to the way that the House of Representatives is conducting its business. This further delayed the vote, as the Speaker of the House had to rule on each point of order.
- Using procedural maneuvers: Democratic representatives also used procedural maneuvers to try to prevent the bill from coming to a vote. For example, they objected to the unanimous consent request, which is a request to pass a bill or motion without a vote.
- Forcing the House to adjourn: Finally, Democratic representatives used a procedural maneuver to force the House to adjourn. This ended the debate on the bill and prevented it from coming to a vote.
The filibuster in 1841 was successful in preventing the recharter of the Second Bank of the United States. It also showed that the House of Representatives was vulnerable to obstructionism, and it set a precedent for future filibusters.
FAQ
Do you have questions about filibusters? Here are some frequently asked questions and answers:
Question 1: What is a filibuster?
Answer 1: A filibuster is a tactic used to delay or prevent a vote on a bill or other motion in a legislative body, typically through extended debate or other dilatory tactics.
Question 2: Where are filibusters used?
Answer 2: Filibusters are used in both the United States Senate and the House of Representatives, though they are more common in the Senate.
Question 3: How do filibusters work?
Answer 3: Filibusters typically involve one or more members of the legislative body speaking for hours or even days on end, submitting numerous amendments to the bill or motion, or using procedural maneuvers to delay the vote.
Question 4: Why are filibusters used?
Answer 4: Filibusters can be used for a variety of reasons, including to block legislation that the filibusterer opposes, to force the majority party to compromise on a bill, or to simply delay the legislative process.
Question 5: Are filibusters effective?
Answer 5: Filibusters can be effective in delaying or even preventing legislation from being passed. However, they can also be seen as a form of obstructionism that prevents the legislative process from working as it should.
Question 6: Are there any rules governing filibusters?
Answer 6: The rules governing filibusters vary depending on the legislative body. In the United States Senate, there is a tradition of unlimited debate, which means that any senator can speak for as long as they want on any bill or motion. However, cloture can be invoked to end debate with a 60-vote majority.
Question 7: Are there any limits on filibusters?
Answer 7: In the United States Senate, there is no time limit on filibusters. However, cloture can be invoked to end debate with a 60-vote majority. In the House of Representatives, the previous question rule can be used to end debate with a majority vote.
Closing Paragraph for FAQ
These are just some of the most frequently asked questions about filibusters. If you have any other questions, please feel free to ask.
Now that you know more about filibusters, you can learn more about other aspects of the legislative process.
Tips
Here are a few tips for understanding filibusters:
Tip 1: Understand the purpose of filibusters. Filibusters can be used for a variety of reasons, including to block legislation that the filibusterer opposes, to force the majority party to compromise on a bill, or to simply delay the legislative process.
Tip 2: Be aware of the rules governing filibusters. The rules governing filibusters vary depending on the legislative body. In the United States Senate, there is a tradition of unlimited debate, which means that any senator can speak for as long as they want on any bill or motion. However, cloture can be invoked to end debate with a 60-vote majority.
Tip 3: Follow the news to see how filibusters are being used. Filibusters are often used on high-profile bills, so it is important to follow the news to see how they are being used and what the impact is.
Tip 4: Contact your elected officials to express your views on filibusters. If you have strong feelings about filibusters, you can contact your elected officials to express your views. This can help them to understand the public's opinion on filibusters and may influence their decision-making.
Closing Paragraph for Tips
By following these tips, you can learn more about filibusters and how they are used in the legislative process.
Now that you have learned more about filibusters, you can explore other aspects of the legislative process.
Conclusion
Summary of Main Points
Filibusters are a tactic used to delay or prevent a vote on a bill or other motion in a legislative body. They can be used for a variety of reasons, including to block legislation that the filibusterer opposes, to force the majority party to compromise on a bill, or to simply delay the legislative process. Filibusters are more common in the United States Senate than in the House of Representatives. The rules governing filibusters vary depending on the legislative body. Filibusters can be effective in delaying or even preventing legislation from being passed, but they can also be seen as a form of obstructionism that prevents the legislative process from working as it should.
Closing Message
Filibusters are a controversial tactic, but they are a part of the legislative process in the United States. They can be used to delay or prevent legislation from being passed, but they can also be used to force the majority party to compromise on a bill. It is important to understand how filibusters work and why they are used in order to form an opinion on this issue.